I have fun by looking at rocks. No really... I'm doing my masters on them. But no soft-sediment crap. That's scum hiding the good stuff. In Calgary since Jan 4, 2006. I am now 92.4% closer to the mountains I love.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

life update

"Day's touchdown victory dance led him to runway 36L, where he was finally taken out by flight 354 from Edmonton."

Been a while since I just said what's going on in my life, and after all, that's what this blog thing originally was; a way of friends from back home keeping up to date with me, since we're all scattered across the country.

The last post with any sort of me-update was back in March. Since then I've gone skiing a lot, zapped a lot of rock samples with electrons, marked a lot of exams, helped people move apartments, done taxes, and (excitingly) worked out that I can afford that Mazda that I so desperately crave in December, all being well. I'm not sure if I'll actually get it at that point. It really depends on the likeliness that on any given weekend someone with a car will be going skiing, and may be willing to take me.

I was very very stupid with my skiing this year, going out 17 times total (for 19 days of skiing), mostly at Sunshine, with a couple of trips to Louise, one to Kicking Horse, and two to Fernie. I would have easily paid off a Sunshine pass, and I paid way more in rentals than I would have had I just bought some decent skis at the beginning of the season. I plan to avoid the same mistake next season.

I'm also (90% sure) moving into a new apartment with a couple of friends who play musical instruments, sometime in June. This necessitates acquiring some decent keyboard equipment so we can jam. Not only that, but the place (which I haven't seen yet) is apparently amazing. It will be nice to have a place I could actually have some people over, rather than just a place with not even a table, which has never felt like anything more than a temporary residence. In fairness, though, the location of my current place is nigh unbeatable.

Right now I'm in Trail, BC, TAing a fourth-year field school in igneous and metamorphic geology. I've never been to southern BC before, and this area in particular is quite beautiful. The weather isn't cooperating, unfortunately, with rain every day since we arrived in town. We're mapping what essentially amounts to three plutons (intrusions of magma which cooled deep underground, now exposed at the surface thanks to erosion), over hills with excellent exposure (i.e. a high percentage of the ground surface is bedrock, rather than vegetation or loose rocks). Unfortunately the rain makes the hills a bit dangerous in places, but once it really starts coming down we call it a day anyway. If it were my own camp/research, we'd still work, just avoid the very steepest stuff.

That's another thing I've been planning for: the upcoming field season. I'm really looking forward to this summer, and I know what I want to pin down, tie up, and leave out. My supervisor is coming into the field with me for at least a week, which is nice as I only got one day last year! My main objective is to learn as much as I can about transposition (extreme shearing, in simple terms), and how to identify it, so I can decide whether this effect is widespread or localised in my field area. Previous literature suggests that primary sedimentary structures (layering, grading, etc) can be identified, but frankly, last summer, I found none that were unequivocal. I was, of course, drawing on my experience from the heavily transposed Monashee Complex rocks I worked on before, which are directly south of me about 70 km. Therefore, I've been inadvertently trained to look for (and see) structures associated with strong shearing, rather than sedimentary structures in well cooked-up rocks, which may not have been sheared so much (although I certainly still think they've been exceedingly buggered up). A problem is that the geology between my area and the Monashee Complex is not strongly nailed down. There may be no real stratigraphic discontinuity between the regions, meaning my rocks are a part of the Complex. I need to order some PhD theses from this 70 km stretch to see what may be going on.

Sorry for the geo-ranting. It's just my nature.

Someday, when I'm feeling brave, I'll put up some more funny pictures. I haven't done that in ages.

Cheers all.

5 Comments:

Blogger Dr Mich said...

It's funny, I've just been toying with the idea of taking a Mazda 3 out for a test drive. I doubt that they'll have a manual transmition version available though.

Like you, it's driving me nuts that I can't get to the Mts whenever I want!

FYI, my Dad loves his Mazda 6.

9:57 AM, May 03, 2007

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funny pictures are awesome :)

2:16 PM, May 03, 2007

 
Blogger Grumball said...

Yeah I've droned on and on about the Mazdaspeed 6 on this blog... but it really is unbeatable value. Very few are being sold, of course, because it is not a respected badge, and if there's anything I'm learning more and more by the year, it's that people are capable of incredibly mindless materialism, and would rather have the BMW badge car than the visual subtlety of this Mazda. Should be some good deals on 07 models in the fall.

The 3 is an enigma... there are a phenomenal number on the roads. I think the styling is fantastic, and apparently they are really nice to drive too.

I decided a while ago that whatever I get, it'll be a manual transmission all-wheel-drive car.

1:14 AM, May 05, 2007

 
Blogger Grumball said...

*not that Mazda's aren't respected, but for $40k, it seems most people would rather have a BMW 328i sedan. The beemer has 44 less horsepower, rear-wheel-drive (awd in the mazda), garish styling, and to me reeks of "look at me, I've got a BMW!".

The 'speed 6, on the other hand, says a quiet "I'm just a Mazda 6, a family sedan" - then outperforms the beemer, and also drives well in Canadian winters!

They made a similar comparison on Top Gear, but had more details, concluding with "Why would anybody buy the BM?!" And yet Mazda can barely shift 5000 'speed 6s a year over all of North America.

1:31 AM, May 05, 2007

 
Blogger Dr Mich said...

Unlike you, I'm after cheap and efficient! I've just discovered that Mazda parts are expensive. So my search is now going to include Honda Fit and Toyota Yaris cars.

Can't stand driving automatics, I just don't feel in control of the car. Depending on where you are and what you are doing, the drive can become very frustrating :-S

11:07 AM, May 05, 2007

 

Post a Comment

<< Home